
Hypermine
Add a review FollowOverview
-
Founded Date October 22, 1922
-
Sectors Accounting
-
Posted Jobs 0
-
Viewed 5
Company Description
This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models
DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese expert system company that develops open-source big language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the company in 2023 and works as its CEO.
The DeepSeek-R1 design provides actions equivalent to other contemporary big language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and needs a tenth of the computing power of a comparable LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI designs were developed amid United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were meant to restrict the capability of these two countries to develop innovative AI systems. [6] [7]
On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its first free chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had exceeded ChatGPT as the most-downloaded free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia’s share rate to come by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success versus bigger and more established rivals has actually been referred to as “upending AI“, [8] constituting “the very first shot at what is becoming an international AI area race”, [11] and ushering in “a new era of AI brinkmanship”. [12]
DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, models, and training information open-source, allowing its code to be easily readily available for use, modification, watching, and creating documents for building purposes. [13] The business reportedly vigorously hires young AI scientists from leading Chinese universities, [8] and works with from outside the computer technology field to diversify its models’ knowledge and abilities. [3]
In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had actually been trading considering that the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on developing and utilizing AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer exclusively utilized AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative expert system chatbot open source, indicating its code is easily offered for use, adjustment, and watching. This includes permission to access and use the source code, along with design documents, for developing purposes. [13]
According to 36Kr, Liang had constructed up a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government enforced AI chip limitations on China. [15]
In April 2023, High-Flyer started a synthetic general intelligence lab dedicated to research developing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s financial business. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the laboratory became its own business, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Venture capital companies hesitated in providing funding as it was unlikely that it would have the ability to produce an exit in a brief period of time. [15]
After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which offered strong performance for a low price, DeepSeek became called the catalyst for China’s AI model cost war. It was quickly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the price of their AI designs to compete with the company. Despite the low price charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its rivals that were losing money. [20]
DeepSeek is focused on research and has no in-depth plans for commercialization; [20] this likewise permits its technology to avoid the most rigid arrangements of China’s AI guidelines, such as needing consumer-facing innovation to abide by the government’s controls on info. [3]
DeepSeek’s hiring preferences target technical capabilities instead of work experience, leading to many brand-new hires being either recent university graduates or developers whose AI careers are less developed. [18] [3] Likewise, the business recruits individuals without any computer technology background to help its technology understand other topics and knowledge locations, including having the ability to create poetry and perform well on the infamously difficult Chinese college admissions examinations (Gaokao). [3]
Development and release history
DeepSeek LLM
On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek released its first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is available for complimentary to both researchers and business users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an additional license contract (“DeepSeek license”) concerning “open and accountable downstream use” for the design itself. [21]
They are of the exact same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series includes 8 models, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]
1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of guideline data. This produced the Instruct models.
They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, connected by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]
On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B criteria in both Base and Chat forms (no Instruct was launched). It was developed to contend with other LLMs offered at the time. The paper claimed benchmark results higher than the majority of open source LLMs at the time, particularly Llama 2. [26]: area 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the model was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the model itself. [27]
The architecture was essentially the very same as those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text obtained by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]
The Chat variations of the two Base designs was also released simultaneously, obtained by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]
On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B criteria (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was basically the like DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared similar efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a version of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared professionals” that are constantly queried, and “routed experts” that may not be. They discovered this to assist with expert balancing. In basic MoE, some experts can become extremely relied on, while other professionals may be seldom used, losing criteria. Attempting to balance the experts so that they are similarly used then triggers experts to reproduce the very same capacity. They proposed the shared specialists to find out core capabilities that are frequently utilized, and let the routed professionals to discover the peripheral capacities that are hardly ever utilized. [28]
In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing math: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]
1. Initialize with a previously pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following design by SFT Base with 776K math problems and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step services. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The benefit design was a process reward model (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd method. [30] This benefit design was then utilized to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K math concerns “related to GSM8K and MATH”. The benefit model was continually upgraded during training to avoid reward hacking. This led to the RL design.
V2
In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 designs, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The two larger models were trained as follows: [31]
1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This resulted in DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in two stages. The very first stage was trained to fix math and coding issues. This phase used 1 reward model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The 2nd phase was trained to be valuable, safe, and follow guidelines. This stage utilized 3 benefit models. The helpfulness and safety benefit designs were trained on human preference information. The rule-based benefit model was manually programmed. All experienced reward designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This resulted in the launched version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.
They selected 2-staged RL, since they discovered that RL on thinking information had “unique qualities” different from RL on basic information. For example, RL on reasoning could improve over more training actions. [31]
The two V2-Lite designs were smaller, and trained similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only went through SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite variation to assist “more research and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]
Architecturally, the V2 models were significantly modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They changed the basic attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and utilized the mix of specialists (MoE) alternative formerly released in January. [28]
The Financial Times reported that it was less expensive than its peers with a price of 2 RMB for each million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]
In June 2024, they launched 4 designs in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]
1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained further for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to create 20K code-related and 30K math-related instruction information, then combined with a direction dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The reward for math problems was computed by comparing with the ground-truth label. The reward for code issues was created by a reward model trained to anticipate whether a program would pass the unit tests.
DeepSeek-V2.5 was launched in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by integrating DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]
V3
In December 2024, they released a base model DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat design DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is essentially the same as V2. They were trained as follows: [37]
1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mostly English and Chinese. It consisted of a higher ratio of mathematics and programming than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of thinking (mathematics, programming, reasoning) and non-reasoning (creative writing, roleplay, easy question answering) data. Reasoning information was generated by “professional designs”. Non-reasoning data was produced by DeepSeek-V2.5 and checked by humans. – The “professional models” were trained by beginning with an unspecified base model, then SFT on both information, and synthetic information created by an internal DeepSeek-R1 model. The system timely asked the R1 to reflect and verify during thinking. Then the professional models were RL using an undefined benefit function.
– Each professional design was trained to create simply artificial reasoning information in one specific domain (math, programming, logic).
– Expert designs were utilized, instead of R1 itself, because the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, poor formatting, and extreme length”.
4. Model-based reward models were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice information including both last benefit and chain-of-thought leading to the last reward. The reward model produced benefit signals for both concerns with objective but free-form responses, and questions without unbiased responses (such as innovative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO utilizing both benefit designs and rule-based reward. The rule-based benefit was computed for mathematics problems with a last response (put in a box), and for programming problems by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.
The DeepSeek team performed extensive low-level engineering to attain efficiency. They utilized mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the basic 32-bit, requiring unique GEMM regimens to collect properly. They used a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They reduced the communication latency by overlapping thoroughly calculation and interaction, such as devoting 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for only inter-GPU interaction. They decreased interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the precise maker each specialist was on in order to prevent certain devices being queried regularly than the others, including auxiliary to the training loss function, and other load-balancing strategies. [37]
After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are connected by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]
Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 surpassed Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]
R1
On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview became available via DeepSeek’s API, in addition to by means of a chat user interface after logging in. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for sensible inference, mathematical reasoning, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek declared that it went beyond efficiency of OpenAI o1 on criteria such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal specified when it utilized 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 design reached a solution quicker than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]
On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business likewise released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however rather are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, including LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial information created by R1. [47]
A conversation between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant resolves it. The assistant first thinks about the thinking process in the mind and then supplies the user with the answer. The thinking process and response are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning process here address here. User:. Assistant:
DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained exclusively using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they used no model-based benefit. All reward functions were rule-based, “mainly” of 2 types (other types were not defined): precision rewards and format rewards. Accuracy benefit was inspecting whether a boxed response is proper (for mathematics) or whether a code passes tests (for programs). Format reward was inspecting whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]
As R1-Zero has problems with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to address these problems and further improve thinking: [47]
1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” data all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the same RL procedure as R1-Zero, but also with a “language consistency benefit” to encourage it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal model not released.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning data from the internal model, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the produced reasoning had an incorrect last response, then it is removed). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic information for 2 epochs.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for thinking jobs) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.
Distilled models were trained by SFT on 800K information synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a comparable way as step 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]
Assessment and reactions
DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually exceeded ChatGPT as the highest-rated complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot supposedly answers concerns, resolves reasoning problems and composes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests used by American AI companies. [3]
DeepSeek-V3 uses substantially less resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers using as lots of as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to require just about 2,000 GPUs, particularly the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is approximately one tenth of what United States tech giant Meta invested building its most current AI innovation. [3]
DeepSeek’s competitive performance at fairly minimal expense has been acknowledged as potentially challenging the global dominance of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, explained the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik moment” for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 model was supposedly “on par with” one of OpenAI’s latest models when utilized for tasks such as mathematics, coding, and natural language reasoning; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen likewise described R1 as “AI’s Sputnik minute”. [51]
DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media widely applauded DeepSeek as a nationwide property. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with professionals and asked him to provide opinions and recommendations on a draft for comments of the annual 2024 federal government work report. [55]
DeepSeek’s optimization of restricted resources has highlighted prospective limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, which consist of export constraints on innovative AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the business’s AI models subsequently “triggered market turmoil” [57] and caused shares in significant worldwide technology companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech firms likewise sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] An international selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, triggered by the release of the R1 design, had led to record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of worth was wiped off American stocks. [50]
Leading figures in the American AI sector had blended reactions to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose companies are associated with the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “super excellent”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who revealed The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed apprehension of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various business, consisting of Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to use the design in their program. [68]
On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek limited its new user registration to phone numbers from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a “large-scale” cyberattack disrupted the proper performance of its servers. [69] [70]
Some sources have observed that the main application programs interface (API) version of R1, which runs from servers located in China, uses censorship systems for subjects that are considered politically delicate for the federal government of China. For example, the design declines to respond to concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI may at first generate a response, but then deletes it shortly afterwards and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my existing scope. Let’s discuss something else.” [72] The incorporated censorship mechanisms and constraints can only be removed to a restricted level in the open-source variation of the R1 design. If the “core socialist worths” specified by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are ended. [74] When tested by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 explained Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s territory,” and mentioned: “We securely oppose any type of ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist activities and are committed to achieving the complete reunification of the motherland through peaceful means.” [75] In January 2025, Western researchers had the ability to deceive DeepSeek into offering specific answers to some of these topics by asking for in its response to swap specific letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]
Security and personal privacy
Some experts fear that the federal government of China might utilize the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading disinformation, security and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy conditions say “We store the info we collect in safe servers found in the People’s Republic of China … We may gather your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you provide to our design and Services”. Although the information storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s privacy policy, [79] a Wired short article reports this as security issues. [80] In reaction, the Italian information defense authority is looking for additional details on DeepSeek’s collection and use of personal information, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had started a nationwide security review. [81] [82] Taiwan’s federal government prohibited making use of DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security premises and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a questions into DeepSeek’s use of personal info. [83]
Artificial intelligence industry in China.
Notes
^ a b c The variety of heads does not equal the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the model called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview required selecting “Deep Think enabled”, and every user might use it only 50 times a day.
References
^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s low-cost, open AI model DeepSeek delights researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic exposes an AI world prepared to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Competing With Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s less expensive designs and weaker chips cast doubt on trillions in AI infrastructure spending”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports might hit India’s AI aspirations”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia examination signals broadening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you need to understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to plunge?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a top Chinese AI model conquered US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the original on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer”. Financial Times. Archived from the initial on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at primary · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at primary”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design exceeds Meta, OpenAI items”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, outperforms Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model appears to be one of the very best ‘open’ challengers yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: unleashing supercharged thinking power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s first thinking model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI startup DeepSeek overtakes ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has actually reached its Sputnik minute”. The Hill. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn rubbed out US stocks after Chinese company reveals AI chatbot” – by means of The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek positions a difficulty to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika states”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI business’s AI design breakthrough highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot stimulates US market chaos, wiping $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek sparks international AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “extremely excellent”: “We should take the developments out of China very, really seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘outstanding'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson slams China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – via NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman praises: What leaders state on DeepSeek’s disruption”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘concerns’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests massive Nvidia GPU facilities”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS customers, including Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI designs”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek struck with ‘large-scale’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek briefly limited brand-new sign-ups, pointing out ‘massive harmful attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually stimulated a $1 trillion panic – and it does not care about totally free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We tried DeepSeek. It worked well, up until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a global AI race: geopolitics, development and the rise of mayhem”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek shocks Silicon Valley, offering the AI race its ‘Sputnik minute'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI presents powerful cyber, data privacy dangers”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts prompt caution over usage of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has painted a substantial TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on data security”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House evaluates result of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, official says”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.